Environment and Natural Resources
Environment in global politics
Explain the different agendas of the North and the South at Rio.
All over the world, the environment is getting worse: farmland is losing fertility, grasslands are overgrazed, fisheries are overfished, water is scarce and polluted, forests are cut down, and the ozone layer has thinned.
Why is this a matter of politics and not just science?
- No single government can fix it: pollution and climate cross borders.
- It raises political questions: who caused the damage, who should pay to fix it, and who decides?
How the environment came on to the world agenda:
| Year | Event |
|---|---|
| 1972 | the Club of Rome published Limits to Growth, warning that the Earth's resources would run out if growth continued unchecked |
| 1972 | the UN set up the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) |
| 1987 | the Brundtland Report, Our Common Future, warned that the old kind of growth could not last |
| 1992 | the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, attended by 170 states |
At Rio, the rich North and the poor South came with different agendas:
- The North cared most about ozone depletion and global warming.
- The South wanted to talk about development and how to balance it with environmental care. It argued that the North had caused most of the damage while getting rich.
Rio's outcomes:
- conventions on climate change and biodiversity;
- Agenda 21, a list of practices for development that protects the environment;
- the idea of sustainable development: growth that meets today's needs without harming the ability of future generations to meet theirs.
Critics said Agenda 21 favoured growth over ecology, but Rio made the environment a central issue of world politics.
Practise this lesson
Questions that get harder as you improve, a Tutor that helps without giving the answer away, and progress you can see. Free for every learner.
No account, no email address. Opens the real product.